Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS vs Ubuntu 25.04 |
Choosing between a point-release LTS and a shiny interim release isn’t just a vibe check—it’s a commitment to a cadence. Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS (“Noble Numbat”) gives you a rock-solid base with a fresher hardware stack, while Ubuntu 25.04 (“Plucky Puffin”) delivers GNOME and kernel features at full tilt. Here’s the showdown.
TL;DR
-
Pick 24.04.3 LTS if you want multi-year stability, predictable updates, and newer drivers via the HWE stack. Great for production, creators, devs, and laptops that need everything to “just work.”
-
Pick 25.04 if you want latest GNOME 48, performance niceties (triple buffering/HDR toggles), and bleeding-edge enablement for modern CPUs/GPUs—accepting you’ll upgrade again soon.
Release Cadence & Support
-
24.04.3 LTS: Third point release of Noble with refreshed ISOs and a Hardware Enablement (HWE) kernel. Standard support stretches to 2029 (ESM beyond). This is the “install and exhale” choice.
-
25.04: An interim release, supported until January 2026. You get the latest stack sooner, but you’ll hop to the next release within a year.
What’s New Under the Hood
Kernel & Drivers
-
24.04.3 LTS adopts the Linux 6.14 HWE kernel (backported from 25.04), bringing wider device support and performance/graphics updates—without abandoning LTS steadiness.
-
25.04 shipped on the 6.14 series as well and saw quick fixes land early in the cycle (e.g., Wi-Fi/Intel quirks addressed by 6.14.3 for some users). This is classic interim-release velocity.
Desktop Experience (GNOME)
-
25.04 delivers GNOME 48, enabling triple buffering for smoother frames and introducing UX niceties (e.g., Wellbeing panel; HDR controls on supported hardware).
-
24.04.3 LTS stays on the Noble GNOME track, prioritizing polish and stability while inheriting graphics/perf updates via HWE and Mesa refreshes in the point release.
Wayland vs Xorg (Reality Check)
-
Wayland is the default direction; interim releases push it harder, while LTS remains conservative and broadly compatible. If you rely on odd capture stacks or legacy apps, LTS + Xorg fallback is safer; if you want Wayland performance and HDR experimentation, 25.04 leans forward.
Developer Tooling & Workflows
-
25.04 highlights fresh enablement and a new “devpack” for Spring (Java folks rejoice), plus improved install/boot flow—handy for quickly provisioning dev boxes.
-
24.04.3 LTS is the default choice for CI/CD fleets and reproducible dev environments. You get the stable base, with modern compilers and drivers via HWE, and a tame upgrade path.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Area | Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS (Noble) | Ubuntu 25.04 (Plucky Puffin) |
---|---|---|
Release type | LTS point release | Interim release |
Support window | To 2029 (ESM beyond) | To Jan 2026 |
Kernel | HWE 6.14 (from 25.04) | 6.14 series, rapid updates |
Desktop | GNOME (LTS channel) | GNOME 48, triple buffering, HDR options |
Graphics stack | Updated Mesa in point release | Newest GNOME/graphics features first |
Wayland stance | Conservative, Xorg fallback easy | Aggressive Wayland focus |
Ideal for | Production, creators, long-haul | Early adopters, tinkerers, latest UX |
Bench-Sense (Not Benchmarks)
You’ll feel 25.04’s desktop responsiveness on modern iGPUs/dGPUs thanks to GNOME 48’s pipeline changes and HDR toggles; 24.04.3 narrows the gap through its 6.14 HWE kernel and Mesa updates while keeping the LTS guardrails on. Translation: 25.04 pops first; 24.04.3 catches up just enough to be boring—in the best possible way.
Stability vs. Novelty: Who Should Choose What?
Choose 24.04.3 LTS if you:
-
Need years of updates and predictable rollouts.
-
Depend on pro audio/video workflows, older capture devices, or niche Xorg-only plugins.
-
Maintain servers, K8s nodes, or mixed fleets where consistency beats novelty.
Choose 25.04 if you:
-
Want GNOME 48 features now: smoother compositing, QoL tweaks, early HDR toggles.
-
Own brand-new silicon and like riding the front of enablement waves.
-
Don’t mind upgrading again before next year’s end.
Upgrade Paths (October 2025)
-
From 24.04.x you can install the HWE meta-package to align kernels with 25.04’s series without ditching LTS.
-
From 25.04, plan your hop to 25.10 (or circle back to 24.04 LTS) before support ends in January 2026.
Pros & Cons
Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS
Pros: Long support horizon; HWE kernel 6.14 for modern hardware; conservative desktop changes; excellent for production.
Cons: GNOME/UX features arrive later; some bleeding-edge HDR/Wayland niceties not default.
Ubuntu 25.04
Pros: GNOME 48, triple buffering, improved installer/boot; latest enablement and polish; great daily-driver for new hardware.
Cons: Short support window; occasional early-cycle quirks that may require rapid updates.
Verdict
-
If uptime, muscle memory, and years of support matter, Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS is the winner—now with enough modern kernel/graphics juice to avoid FOMO.
-
If you want the fresh GNOME experience and you’re comfortable upgrading again within a year, Ubuntu 25.04 is delightful—and surprisingly refined for an interim build.
Quick FAQ
Is 24.04.3 LTS “too old” now?
Not with HWE 6.14 + newer Mesa—hardware support is thoroughly modern while keeping LTS stability.
Will Wayland break my setup?
Most users are fine. If you rely on unusual capture/remote-desktop stacks, test Wayland first or stay with LTS where Xorg fallbacks are straightforward.
When do I have to leave 25.04?
Before January 2026. Plan your next hop (25.10 or back to LTS) accordingly.
Comments
Post a Comment