Xed vs Kate: Choosing your Linux Text Editor

on

Xed vs Kate

If you write code, tweak config files, or just need a reliable notepad on Linux, you’ll eventually face a deceptively simple question: Xed or Kate? One is feather-light and delightfully minimal; the other is a Swiss-army editor with deep integrations, power features, and headroom for serious projects. Choosing between them isn’t about “better” in the abstract—it’s about speed vs. power, focus vs. features, Zen vs. cockpit.

TL;DR (Quick Verdict)

  • Pick Xed if you want a fast, zero-friction editor for everyday text, Markdown notes, and simple coding tasks. Minimal UI, low resource usage, clean on Linux Mint/Cinnamon, no drama.

  • Pick Kate if you want a powerful, extensible editor with split views, sessions, rich search/replace, project awareness, Git and LSP integrations, and a highly customizable workflow—especially at home on KDE/Plasma.

What They Are (In One Breath)

  • Xed: Linux Mint’s default text editor. Think “Gedit-style simplicity” with tabs, basic plugins, and just enough syntax highlighting to stay comfortable while you get things done.

  • Kate: KDE’s Advanced Text Editor. Think “IDE features without the IDE bulk”—multi-cursor editing, split panes, breadcrumbs, session management, powerful search, command palette, and more knobs than you’ll use on day one.

Speed & Resource Use

  • Xed starts in a blink and stays out of the way. Perfect for quick edits, editing system files with sudo, jotting ideas.

  • Kate launches fast for a power editor, but it does carry more features, which you’ll feel when stacking plugins, large files, or multi-pane workflows.

If your daily loop is open-edit-close, Xed wins.
If your loop is open-navigate-refactor-search-split-repeat, Kate wins.

Editing Experience

Xed feels like:

  • Frictionless basics: tabs, line numbers, word wrap, soft line breaks.

  • Enough syntax highlighting for common languages.

  • Simple preferences: font, indentation, whitespace, autosave options.

Kate feels like:

  • “I can live here”: split views, saved sessions, per-project settings.

  • Command palette & configurable shortcuts for fast navigation.

  • Power find/replace with regex, multi-file search, and fine-grained filters.

  • Multi-cursor & block editing that speeds up repetitive changes.

Coding Features (Where Kate Pulls Ahead)

  • Language Server Protocol (LSP) support for completions, go-to-definition, diagnostics, and hover docs when paired with language servers.

  • Integrated terminal so you can run build commands without leaving the editor.

  • Breadcrumbs & outlines for quick structural navigation in large files.

  • Project-aware features that remember your session, open files, and context.

Xed keeps it simple—syntax colors, basic indentation, and a clean UI.
Kate lets you grow—from casual edits to full-on coding sprints.

Plugins & Extensibility

  • Xed: A small, pragmatic plugin set (spell check, code snippets, etc.). You’ll find what you need for everyday text.

  • Kate: A rich plugin ecosystem—formatters, linters (via LSP), VCS helpers, session tools, UI tweaks, and more granular controls than you’ll likely need at first.

If you love toggling features until the editor feels like yours, Kate is a playground. If you want “it just works,” Xed is serenity.

Desktop Integration

  • Xed integrates beautifully on Linux Mint/Cinnamon and other GTK environments. It looks right, behaves right.

  • Kate is native to KDE/Plasma, with polished Qt theming and tight KDE integration. Works fine on GTK desktops too, but looks and feels most at home on Plasma.

Match editor to desktop for the best fit and fewer theming quirks.

File Types & Large Files

  • Everyday text & configs: both do fine.

  • Huge logs and mega files: both can open them, but Kate provides more visibility tools (split panes, advanced search) to make heavy lifting tolerable.

Stability & Learning Curve

  • Xed: near-zero learning curve. Open, edit, done.

  • Kate: shallow entry, deep mastery. You can start in five minutes and still be discovering new efficiencies weeks later.

Accessibility & Theming

  • Xed: Focused, with dark mode and essential font/contrast controls.

  • Kate: Extensive theming, per-language color schemes, editor profiles, and input behaviors.

If you’re picky about fonts, ligatures, caret behavior, whitespace rendering, and per-project overrides, Kate scratches that itch.

Typical Workflows

Xed workflows

  • Quick config edits (/etc/...), notes, readme tweaks

  • One-off scripts and light Markdown

  • “Open → Fix → Save → Close” cycles all day

Kate workflows

  • Multi-file refactors with split views

  • Regex-heavy search/replace across projects

  • LSP-assisted languages (TypeScript, Rust, Go, Python, etc.)

  • Long sessions with saved state and frequent context switching

Pros & Cons (At a Glance)

Xed — Pros

  • Ultra-fast startup, minimal RAM

  • Clean, distraction-free UI

  • Perfect for GTK/Mint users

  • Great for notes, configs, and small scripts

Xed — Cons

  • Limited extensibility

  • No deep project/LSP features

  • Fewer power-user affordances

Kate — Pros

  • LSP, multi-cursor, split panes, sessions

  • Project-aware navigation and powerful search

  • Integrated terminal and configurable everything

  • Scales from small edits to serious dev work

Kate — Cons

  • More complexity than some users need

  • Slightly heavier footprint

  • Best feel on KDE/Plasma (though cross-desktop is fine)

Quick Decision Tree

  • Do you mostly open a file, change a line, and bail? → Xed

  • Do you need code intelligence, multi-pane workflows, or project sessions? → Kate

  • On Linux Mint/Cinnamon and want a native feel? → Xed

  • On KDE/Plasma and want native power? → Kate

  • You’re a minimalist → Xed

  • You’re a tweaker/power user → Kate

FAQ

Is Xed good for programming?
Yes—for small scripts and light editing. For rich tooling, jump to Kate.

Does Kate replace a full IDE?
Not always—but with LSP and plugins, it covers a surprising amount of ground for many languages.

Which editor is lighter on resources?
Xed. It’s designed to be snappy and minimal.

Will Kate feel slow on older hardware?
Generally no; it’s efficient for a feature-rich editor. But Xed will feel lighter on very constrained systems.

Can I use both?
Absolutely. Many users keep Xed for quick edits and Kate for longer sessions and bigger tasks.

Bottom Line

  • Choose Xed if you value speed, simplicity, and a tranquil UI for everyday text work.

  • Choose Kate if you want serious editing power without committing to a full IDE—LSP features, split views, sessions, and a command palette that accelerates real development.

Both are excellent. Your workflow decides.

Comments

Post a Comment